Just how many freedoms have been taken away, violated and or stoppled?
People, you need to get involved with O in office. Our Freedoms are being treated
like a worn rug, ready to be tossed in areas of our Amendments.
I am Lobbying for the First Amendment that has been tossed aside in Gloucester, Virginia E.g. Petitions and the Citizen's sanctioned for applying thie respective rights under the First Amendment. I have gotten our Delegates to propose and develop the House Bill 2465 which has passed,but our lazy Gov "Citizen Kaine" is
doing the turtle trot in signing this House Bill and this is Time Sensitive.
Stay informed, and stay educated on our Bill of Rights.
Wednesday, March 18, 2009
Sunday, December 14, 2008
Do You Know Your First Amendment
Last week the representation for the Board of Supervisors, Mr. Troy served 41Patriots for exercising their First Amendment rights, papers for filing the petitions under a " technical flaw"- language.
It contacting several people who are lobbying, this issue is going to be addressed accordingly. The Code stands, but there are no templates for the petition for removal of elected officials, when the seriousness of the people require Proof of their intentions.
Our rights to petition the government have been stomped on by Troy and his association with the current Attorney General. The petitions were filed with the court. There are no leading petitions to date to warrant such audacity.
It is apparent, lobbying for such " seriousness of the people" has to have a stamp of approval, before the court decides the people are serious.
Where and how does one find out just how serious the people are? It should have been the 6000 people who signed the petitions. Now we have 41 people involved with the petitions who have been served papers for their efforts to question the local government and their practices. Notaries were in place while the petitioners signed their names, valid ID's in place, voter registrations cards were in hand and the petition was thrown out.
Under code 24.2-235 there is no such language as to just how this is to be done.
Legally. Under the US Constitution a written petition without redress of grievances is stated within the Amendment. As does the Virginia Constitution.
If our Government is to be progressive, and we have a 1975 Law-2002 Law regarding removing elected officials- no template to date has been found.
This is recessive law, not progressive law. Wouldn't the sitting Judge have known that, would the Clerk of the Court who stated, she called the Electoral Board and the petitions were filed, regardless of knowledge beforehand, postponed the case aside from continuing?
It contacting several people who are lobbying, this issue is going to be addressed accordingly. The Code stands, but there are no templates for the petition for removal of elected officials, when the seriousness of the people require Proof of their intentions.
Our rights to petition the government have been stomped on by Troy and his association with the current Attorney General. The petitions were filed with the court. There are no leading petitions to date to warrant such audacity.
It is apparent, lobbying for such " seriousness of the people" has to have a stamp of approval, before the court decides the people are serious.
Where and how does one find out just how serious the people are? It should have been the 6000 people who signed the petitions. Now we have 41 people involved with the petitions who have been served papers for their efforts to question the local government and their practices. Notaries were in place while the petitioners signed their names, valid ID's in place, voter registrations cards were in hand and the petition was thrown out.
Under code 24.2-235 there is no such language as to just how this is to be done.
Legally. Under the US Constitution a written petition without redress of grievances is stated within the Amendment. As does the Virginia Constitution.
If our Government is to be progressive, and we have a 1975 Law-2002 Law regarding removing elected officials- no template to date has been found.
This is recessive law, not progressive law. Wouldn't the sitting Judge have known that, would the Clerk of the Court who stated, she called the Electoral Board and the petitions were filed, regardless of knowledge beforehand, postponed the case aside from continuing?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
